Though DP8 is a reliable workhorse, moments after DP9’s launch, an internal dialogue assured me I would not be returning to Version 8 anymore. MOTU Digital Performer - Competitive Upgrade (Boxed) Audio workstation software with MIDI sequencingPLEASE NOTE: This is an upgrade / crossgrade product. In the rare case the upgrade does not match anticipation or has technical issues that need resolution, simply launch a prior version and continue working. It’s good to note that with DP, it's not necessary to un-install prior versions before installation or upgrading. The installation of DP9 was also effortless, taking less than :90 to complete. Import loops, launch virtual instruments and 3rd-party plug-ins: Digital Performer is the consummate host. While this experiment was hardly scientific, I’d say there was about a 10 to 15 percent performance increase across the board for all commands, even with identical buffer settings. Work musically with features like the Drum Editor and QuickScribe notation, then switch gears for creative production techniques with inspiring plug-ins like DP's Subkick, Ensemble Chorus, and guitar FX plug-ins. It appeared that DP9 used a touch less RAM with a touch more CPU draw. After opening the same massive session in both DP8 and DP9, I examined the Mac System Profiler, as well as the CPU graphical display in both DP sessions. This discovery prompted me to compare the two just to make sure I was not imagining things. Sessions opened quickly and responded with enthusiasm. Upon first launch, the difference was immediate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |